Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Glinski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw talk 07:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Christopher Glinski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not really meet WP:ANYBIO as it stands. None of the sources really seem appropriate -- one linking to his law office's web site, and the rest don't relate directly to this article's subject. Dolotta (talk) 00:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The lists he has been on are just not enough to make him notable, and the case he gained "regnional attention" for being the defense attorney in is just not enough to make him notable either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 00:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability. "Top 40 Trial Lawyers Under 40" and  "Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers." is just a marketing thing. TJRC (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.