Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Holt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines at this time. Davewild (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Christopher Holt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an artist's autobiographical article that presents no real evidence of notability, except a link to his website. No independent sources. Grahame (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability not demonstrated. No reliable references. The subject's own website address in the lead sentence looks like a self-promotion exercise.-- Lester  12:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - For now. However, article can be re-created if subject wins the William and Winifred Bowness Photography Prize that is mentioned. Until then, does not appear to be notable.  TN ‑ X - Man  13:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 01:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 03:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.