Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher J. Burke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Christopher J. Burke

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Delete: Agree with the nom that this subject is not notable and does not meet either the WP:GNG or WP:JUDGE. User:Let'srun 01:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Snickers2686 (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delaware, Michigan,  and Washington, D.C..  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  23:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.