Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Judge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Jordan Judge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:NGRIDIRON, also fails WP:NACTOR too and is very thin on sources. Donnie Park (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete; as a college player, the appropriate notability guideline is WP:NCOLLATH, but this article fails that by 100 yards. ansh 666 19:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete You'd think if he was the captain of his team, there'd be a little more there after over half a year. Stats or something. If somebody just created this article this week, I might say give it some time to upgrade it. At this point, I assume there's not enough out there to get it up to snuff on notability. South Nashua (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's his brother Cameron Judge who was the team captain. Just a poor cut'n'paste job on the article creation... ansh 666 19:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. I guess I'm up to a "normal" delete level now in my viewpoint on this one. Thanks for the heads up. South Nashua (talk) 19:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. A college football player can also qualify under WP:GNG, but I am not finding the kind of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources that are needed to satisfy GNG standards. Cbl62 (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.