Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Neyor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Neyor
AfDs for this article: 


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Not notable positions or academic status, sources not reliable; Fails WP:BIO, WP:SOAP, WP:ACADEMIC Pennyfoolish (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters. —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Note sure what inspired a SPA to register and nominate this for deletion, but the subject is clearly notable.  A quick new search shows many articles about Neyor and his activities.  Not sure if the nominator feels the article is promotional or advocating for a cause (SOAP could be either), but it looks 100% neutral to me, and in any case tone is not normally a reason for deletion.  Lastly, it is hardly surprising that an energy analyst/company CEO would fail NACADEMIC - his claim to notability is related to business, not academics.  Pinging  who accepted this at AfC for input. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - (A) Consensus on non-academic status, fails WP:Academic (B) For business, neither positions nor coverage establishes notability. 'Morweh Energy Group, an energy consultancy firm' is not a notable firm and ' former President/CEO of the National Oil Company of Liberia' fails notability as well. Nor does it establish a claim as an 'international energy analyst.' Furthermore, articles mentioned are of questionable reliability and largely related to a prior 'Independent Montserrado County Senatorial candidacy,' a non-notable political position in Liberia and not a business related function (i.e., WP:SOP). This amalgamation does not establish business notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennyfoolish (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You can't !vote twice so have struck..... – Davey 2010 Talk 08:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG and WP:BIO easily. A senatorial candidate and the former president of the National Oil Company in Liberia is surely notable enough for inclusion, I think. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 01:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.