Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Paul Hasson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Scott Burley (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Christopher Paul Hasson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. This article cites WP:BLPPRIMARY sources which promote a lot of Nazi ideology and activities. If he is convicted of all charges, the article can be restored (perhaps with another AfD to determine whether the coverage is too routine or not). Also, he will not be charged on terror offenses. w umbolo  ^^^  10:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I believe this article contains important historical information. I also reference the following guideline "Articles on topics you wish didn't exist for personal belief reasons – Wikipedia contains information on all topics, not just those which any person or group agrees with." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:F050:2F10:8469:91C8:D511:E501 (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. If there are problematic sources, they can be removed. I should note, I created the stub for this article, but plenty of other editors have contributed since then. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG and are-you-f'ing-kidding-me. BLP1E requires three criteria to be met, and #2 and #3 are not met. (#3 in particular is a slam dunk. This is a "significant" event, and he had a "substantial" role in it.) BLPCRIME similarly fails because he's a high-profile individual. Military officers who are caught attempting to assassinate government officials are notable. There is tons of international coverage satisfying GNG. This isn't like some random bank robbery somewhere. I'm stupefied at the suggestion that this shouldn't be in the encyclopedia. By the way, whether he is or isn't convicted (or what he is charged with) has nothing whatsoever to do with notability. We don't write articles or not write articles based on the outcome of local legal proceedings. Leviv&thinsp;ich 14:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * His role in it is zilch. At least per WP:BLPCRIME. w umbolo   ^^^  17:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. Significant event. Good refs. BabbaQ (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per BabbaQ. Mosaicberry (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per BabbaQ and Mosaicberry . Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Mosaicberry's !vote is "per BabbaQ". w umbolo   ^^^  08:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Is that formatted right now? Davidgoodheart (talk) 08:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, BLP1E isn't even remotely applicable here. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - nomination is frivolous and rationale is spurious. Neutralitytalk 14:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you've mixed up the nomination and rationale with your vote. w umbolo   ^^^  17:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. Pretrial release . Makes deletion unavoidable per WP:BLPCRIME. w umbolo   ^^^  17:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing where in BLPCRIME it talks about pretrial release. Leviv&thinsp;ich 22:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly meets WP:NCRIME, and it has sufficient amount of reliable sources. Sheldybett (talk) 10:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Christopher Paul Hasson is not a crime. w umbolo   ^^^  11:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Ethelred unraed (talk) 12:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, subject is being ridiculed on theonion right now. Also, nominator should be topic-banned for hectoring each Keep notvoter. 73.36.160.159 (talk) 02:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC) — 73.36.160.159 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep'. Several in-depth pieces over the past couple months exceed GNG, and furthermore have turned this mid-level officer into a public figure. Icewhiz (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep clear notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.