Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Penczak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Christopher Penczak
Non notable person. Fails WP:V. Been around since November 2005 with little improvement. NothingMuch 16:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. How does this fail WP:V? If you google his name, you get a lot of hits and also personal info about him. Look:, , . -- Nish kid 64 18:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the guy is obviously a notably author. Although I have never heard of him or his books, I'm not a bid wicca fan. The man is notable and the are many hits on him on Google.
 * Keep The article needs more work but already today someone has expanded the article and listed some of his works. Definitely notable, and there is hope for improvement and expansion of this article beyond simply deleting it from existence. Sudachi 20:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. I question if this may be a bad faith nomination. The subject has written numebrous books which have received independent reviews (for example, from the Library Journal and Publishers Weekly). Not only that, his books ranked by Amazon.com in the 30 thousandsth. Ohconfucius 06:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:V. Maybe some ISBNs on his alleged publications would change my opinion, otherwise it's just WP:VSCA. --Dennette 09:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly a published author with multiple books, article simply needs a bit of work. Ekajati 21:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Ohconfucius's suspicion turns out to be correct. The nominator has been confirmed as one of 15 sockpupptets of Mattisse. Thus this is a bad faith nomination. &mdash;Hanuman Das 15:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.