Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Rampant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Christopher Rampant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD template was deleted by IP user without reason. This person fails WP:SOLDIER. Non notable Military person Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (shout)  @ 08:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (articulate)  @ 08:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Mid-ranking officer with no significant decorations. No particular notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 21:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BASIC and WP:SOLDIER. Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP but no prejudice against recreation if he gets a full obituary somewhere important if he dies, i.e. WP:TOOSOON applies. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's clear assertion of notability in the article. The best coverage is this item which is some sort of community newspaper. -- Whpq (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.