Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Reed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Christopher Reed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed U.S. Senate Nominee, only reliable sources are about controversies. No reason to keep since he's never held office / Fails WP:NPOL and WP:N. Unsure about WP:GNG since there is coverage, that's the main discussion here. Redditaddict69 13:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, nothing remarkable or notable, per GNG. Trivial. Kierzek (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge - standard failure under WP:NPOL. While his statements about his opposition might have caused one-off flashes they both lacked any form of lasting coverage and not particularly outside the standard US political coverage during an election bid. Therefore neither NPOL or GNG satisfied. As he was only the actual candidate in one election, I believe it is standard form to redirect appropriately, here United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008 Nosebagbear (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Would you support a merging of the controversies over to that page? Redditaddict</b><b style="color:#339900">6</b><b style="color:#3399FF">9</b> 20:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't critical, but it could be beneficial to merge the actual controversy details to the same location, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable politician per WP:NPOL. Nor does service on a warship make you notable under WP:SOLDIER.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  18:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable failed political candidate. We have decided that such individuals are not notable for being major party candidates alone.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008 per above. Daask (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Nominator Comment: I support a Redirect and/or Merge of the controversies over to the 2008 election. <b style="color:#3399FF">Redditaddict</b><b style="color:#339900">6</b><b style="color:#3399FF">9</b> 02:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.