Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Reinhart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 12:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Christopher Reinhart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I fail to see how someone aged 20 could be a notable historian. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:55, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I think that Christopher Reinhart met the Wikipedia guidelines. In 2019, Christopher Reinhart recieved the most outstanding title from the University of Indonesia (and the Minister of Higher Education). Therefore, he met the second criteria of Wikipedia's notability on academics which says as follows: The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. See: https://www.ui.ac.id/berita/christopher-reinhart-peneliti-mudah-peduli-sejarah.html
 * Christopher Reinhart also promotes the usage of transnational perspective in historical writings. This perspective is relatively new in the discussion of historical research among the University of Indonesia's historian which indicates that his research has a significant impact in his scholarly discipline. Xiahe08
 * My auto translate of the award reads: "Christopher Reinhart was selected as the Achieving Student of the Faculty of Culture, University of Indonesia in 2019. The election of Christopher Reinhart as the main achieving student of FIB UI was supported by good academic achievements. Over the past three years, Rei has published 19 articles and journals about the history of Indonesia." So it is a best student award. The award may have been presented by a minister, although that is not stated in the source, but that doesn't make it a prestigious award in the sense meant by the policy. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , as the creator of the article (and the only article you have edited), do you have a conflict of interest to declare? Edwardx (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7 (no indication of importance). --Tataral (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - core policy Verifiability states: If no reliable independent sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. The article does not contain (and I could not find) any independent sources... let alone enough to satisfy PROF or any other more general notability guideline. Seems like a likely vanity page. -- Netoholic @  18:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources indicate he is a research assistant. Doesn't meet any of the criteria of Prof, or GNG and in addition unable to verify as all the sources in the article were blocked by my ISP as possibly containing malware. Even if he did have the listed papers published, it isn't enough to show notability yet. Maybe later, much later probably. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this blurb. No notability expressed. Trillfendi (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only form of notability claimed in the article is academic, but our standards for academic notability explicitly exclude student awards. Merely having written a few review papers is inadequate for notability; the papers need to be heavily cited, and here they appear not to be. And the supposed references for the article are merely more things the subject has written, not anything that can be used as a reference about the subject. Far too soon. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG and all academic-related notability standard. There is also a possible WP:COI issue as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete A research assistant to an academic who is a redlink must be NN. This is not altered by half a dozen academic articles.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete- Per nom. Fails WP:NACADEMIC- -MA Javadi (talk) 22:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – The ageism of the nomination aside, the subject doesn't appear to come close to meeting WP:NACADEMIC. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 02:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON - doesn't pass GNG nor PROF. Icewhiz (talk) 14:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Research assistants are unlikely to be notable and I didn't find anything in Google Scholar to support a claim of notability for him. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Papaursa (talk) 23:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.