Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Riordan Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:G7. (non-admin closure) Ian.thomson (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Riordan Jones

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability for this author whose works are self-published ebooks, editor who created this has been spamming the subject's ebooks. Obvious COI Dougweller (talk) 16:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Honestly I didn't know there was a Conflict of Interest issue on Wikipedia (I didn't read every guideline). Should I just take my entry down? I figured most authors just posted info about their work where it applies and set up their own bios (since they know the exact dates when their works were copy-written and published and such). I'm not sure what to do now. I only just created an account today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spawnoftyphon (talk • contribs) 16:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - No independent sources = no notability. Could we interpret the above post and this post as reason for db-self?  If not that, I think we could get away with db-promo. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.