Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Scarver (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Scarver
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable under the terms of WP:BIO1E. Dahmer and his acts count as notable; his murderer is only a byline character and therefore is not. KDS 4444 Talk  17:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Oh give me a break.. clearly notable by WP:GNG and CRIME. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep - clearly notable, plenty of sources to be found. After all, if he wasn't notable, why would the Daily Mail and the Huffington Post, among others, write articles about the book deal he was seeking in 2012, 8 years after the Dahmer killing? Robman94 (talk) 22:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is most certainly a notable person. A large amount of people look Jeffrey Dahmer up on the internet, and want to know who his murderer was, just like I. This needs to stay up. KEEP IT. Ellogovna12 (talk) 00:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.