Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Sembroski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Christopher Sembroski

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject does not satisfy general notability. His claim to fame is as a space tourist on a future space expedition, but see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and other policies. There has been substantial independent coverage of the planned mission, but all of the coverage at this point is crystal balling.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep — An astronaut is notable once he has been selected for a space mission and in this precise case he is less than six months away from flight. Preparation for the flight and training of the crew is under way. His flight is indeed the next one to take off from the US. Hektor (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep GNG is met. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply, because the coverage is of the selection, rather than the actual flight. (Besides, the entire premise of that page is WP:V violations, which this clearly is not) He's been selected. NPR and NYT have covered it. Posting some fancy graph doesn't change any of that. Jclemens (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree that WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply; coverage (and reality) goes beyond speculation. There will come a time that civilians selected for space missions will not be notable, but we are not near that point yet. -- \/\/slack ( talk ) 14:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with the above keeps. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 16:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable as being selected for an upcoming spaceflight. He doesn't need to actually fly for that. --mfb (talk) 03:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to pass GNG with present coverage. RockOften (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.