Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Shea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Christopher_Shea
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This newer page has no reliable sources, or barely any. No one seems to be adding sources, references, etc, since it has been created. It has no means to stand at this point and shouldn't be on Wikipedia as of now. Notability and Reliable Sources are the main issues. WikiPassionate (talk) 01:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No real independent sources here and memory alpha is not WP:RS --Artene50 (talk) 03:26, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: as non-notable; no reliable sourcing, as noted by nominating editor. Quis separabit?  23:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nomination fails WP:BEFORE. This actor meets criteria #1 of WP:NACTOR (see IMDB listing for list of numerous acting credits). Dolovis (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails #1 of WP:NACTOR, person does not have any significant roles, single non-notable appearance in an episode of a notable show does not meet the criteria-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  19:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, almost weakly. Performer with multiple recurring roles on several network TV shows, sufficient to qualify under WP:ENT/NACTOR. We routinely keep porn performers with scanter reliable independent coverage. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * HW, I must check my vitals, its an odd day we end up in this configuration on a BLP at AFD! Adult Video News is not the New York Times, but at least its something!--Milowent • hasspoken  13:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, the New York Times doesn't host press releases on its website, letting them masquerade as editorial content. I take it your comment means that next time we're debating a technical PORNBIO pass without genuine independent coverage, you'll be voting delete. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't vote too often in straight PORNBIOs at AFD, because the recent ones I've seen are like this one where the subject doesn't even have that minimal coverage.--Milowent • hasspoken 15:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per NACTOR. I remember his role in a DS9 episode; "I hate Ferengi" - that still cracks me up, but he just doesn't have substantial enough credits or media coverage. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete:  I don't see a single source showing notability, and can't find one.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.