Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Spencer (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Christopher Spencer (author)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

He's a spokesman of behalf of e-bay who's written a "how to" book. There's nothing notable here, and less that's verifiable Scott Mac (Doc) 14:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete The article doesn't mention anything that confers him notability per general WP:N standards. The author fails WP:CREATIVE (unless some new source is brought forward). The book appears to fail WP:BK for notability of its own. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I created this article as a split from the Christopher Spencer (inventor) article.  I agree with the nominator.  Mr Stephen (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Retain The book, which I have read, contains a direct content contribution from a senior employee and legal staff member at eBay and is notable. I do not think this article should be deleted and therefore refute the nomination to delete it.    user- horich  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horich (talk • contribs) 00:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)  — Horich (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * hum, is there any independient source saying that the book is important? --Enric Naval (talk) 04:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - Take a look at this IP's contribs to Lamont Bentley before Christopher Spencer (author) is deleted and the connection is lost. No points for guessing who belongs to that IP address. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.