Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Stoll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Christopher Stoll

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This biographical article seems to be purely for promotional or advertising purposes. Except for a couple promotional articles, it largely is supported by primary sources from sites like Kickstarter, Etsy, and DeviantArt. Additionally, the article was originally created by a user who appears to be the subject. I do not believe the article meets notability requirements for encyclopedic inclusion and does not meet quality standards. Indefensible (talk) 23:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) Leaving out the clearly non-independent sources, we have:
 * Comment on the borderline WP:GNG. Note that I found an additional source as part of my own WP:BEFORE included at bottom of table below. Does not meet WP:NARTIST. Article would certainly require some cleanup. I don't see confirmation that there is COI, and there's some "negative" information about kickstarter campaigns in the article as well. In fact, the negative info itself is an issue given the lack of verifiability. It's just not a great article as it stands.


 * Look at the profile history of the article creator, I am pretty sure that is COI. - Indefensible (talk) 02:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I would believe it, but it could be a mistake so I just don't know for sure. Would not really affect my !vote either way. &mdash;siro&chi;o 03:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. All that I can find on Google are the Pokemon works, and the articles aren't focused on him. I don't see WP:SIGCOV. SWinxy (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.