Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Stollery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Christopher Stollery

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced for over a decade - doesn't appear to pass WP:NACTOR Wotanluzo (talk) 10:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete still appears to be active in the theatre scene in Australia, but I don't see substantial coverage beyond confirmation he's in xyz production. Oaktree b (talk) 16:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely fails WP:NACTOR. LibStar (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Snow Keep. The National Library of Australia has Biographical cuttings on Christopher Stollery, actor, containing one or more cuttings from newspapers or journals which by is self should be enough for an immediate keep. AusStage has a very long list of theatre productions he has appeared in including Notable productions of Hamlet where he played Hamlet ( and Romeo and Juliet where a commentator stated "most outstanding are Christopher Stollery as the swaggering Capulet thug, Tybalt" . Another commentator was not as enthusiastic about his role in Macbeth, “Christopher Stollery produces plenty of sound and fury, but little else, as Macduff.” . A NewsBank search brings up hundreds of hits including where he is the primary focus. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion by Duffbeerforme that point to a pass of WP:NACTOR so that deletion is unnecessary in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 21:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - I can't read all the references shown above, but I think it highly likely that the cumulative volume of reviews meet the GNG. JMWt (talk) 11:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep based on what's presented above, seems to have had a notable stage career. Oaktree b (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.