Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Swagga Nicholas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Christopher Swagga Nicholas

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable per WP:MUSICBIO, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Speedy deletion contested by WP:SPA. Top Jim (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Top Jim (talk) 22:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  —Top Jim (talk) 22:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sufficiently noteworthy to merit a standalone article. Looks like a spam autobiography. -- Rrburke (talk) 23:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources fall short of what is required by both WP:MUS and WP:GNG as they're not WP:RS.Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 15:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This appears to be a reliable source that deals with the subject independently and nontrivially - it just came out yesterday.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 02:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a WP:RS, unfortunately: it's just another copy of the Marketwire press release already cited in the article. Looking at the article now, I see that that press release is actually quoted three times: once from MSNBC, once from Yahoo Finance, and once from PR Wire. All three will carry unedited press releases, so their reliability as news sources doesn't actually make the press release any more reliable. I'll merge those cites now, as they're identical apart from their URLs. Top Jim (talk) 07:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I see no notability here. I see a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources and I found none. I see spam. delete and block sockpuppets. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional or vanity (or both...). No reliable referencing, and a quick g-search reveals masses of copies of a press release, plus the usual places like twitter and blogspot. This indicates hard-working PR but not actual notability. Peridon (talk) 10:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.