Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromocell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Chromocell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable corp, no real coverage, just passing mentions, prs and mill "coverage." Fails just about everything. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 01:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 01:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 01:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.