Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronic Stress (journal)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Chronic Stress (journal)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article PRODded with reason: "Non-notable relatively new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by with reason: "given the editors, it is likely to be notable, and there is no advantage to removing the article". I disagree. 1/ WP:NOTINHERITED. 2/ I agree that the editors are well known researchers and that SAGE is a reputed publisher. However, neither guarantees that the journal will succeed. On my user page I have a list of journals started by reputable publishers that fizzled without leaving much trace. Note also that SAGE may be a reputed publisher, but they are strong mostly in social sciences and humanities, much less in life sciences.

In short, my crystal ball broke yesterday, so I think that the judgment on this journal is still out. At best, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: I have edited the article following the instructions in our journal article writing guide, which resulted in the removal of all references (which were all to the journal's own website, except for one, which was a press release from Yale - the institution where the editors work). The previous version of the article can still be seen here. --Randykitty (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.