Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the CHERUB and Henderson's Boys series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Chronology of the CHERUB and Henderson's Boys series

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article has no real-world notability and it's written with an in-universe perspective, it has zero third-party sources to verify notability and it's a plot-only description of a fictional work. It does not meet the criteria of the general notability guideline or appropriate topics for lists. This is an unneeded content fork and meets the criteria of reasons for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Jfgslo (talk) 19:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Jfgslo (talk) 19:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- excessive fan trivia, written in an in-universe style, with no sources to establish the real-world importance. Reyk  YO!  00:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:CONTENTFORK from the main series article. Being a notable series doesn't entitle you to two different articles about the series. Moreover, this article is entirely an explanation of the plot, and Wikipedia articles are supposed to be WP:NOT only. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If it is a Content fork then why not merge it into either CHERUB or Henderson's Boys? Regards, Rock drum Ba-dumCrash (Driving well?) 15:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Offshoot to wikia or something. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  06:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.