Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysalis project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Chrysalis project

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The project/award doesn't seem notable, and the proposed merge would just be confusing. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  03:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Even the organization that grants this award barely mentions it on their website . The only mentions found in a Google search are people's CVs bragging that they won it. I wouldn't recommend a merge; it seems too non-notable even for a redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Gsingh (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.