Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chu Shong-tin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Chu Shong-tin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article only one credible source Australianblackbelt (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep notable enough for an article. SportsOlympic (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * reply. you are an editor that believes that a local news source is enough to establish notability hence anyone can get a Wikipedia article according to you. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete does not appear to have attracted the requisite secondary coverage required for WP:GNG. Jamesniederle (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete My search did not find multiple examples of significant independent coverage of him. I found several articles by his students about training with him, various videos of him demonstrating techniques, and ads for his dvds--but none of that counts as independent coverage.  The short South China Post article about him recovering from cancer is the closest thing I saw and that's weak coverage as it's based on talking to Chu, his son, and a student.  If someone finds more significant coverage please ping me. Papaursa (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.