Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuba Akpom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 11:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Chuba Akpom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested by an anon with no reason given. The reason this article was proposed for deletion is because the page fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. These reasons are still true after the PROD was contested. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete until he is regularly playing for the first team, he is NN. STatements about his prospects fail WP:CRYSTAL.  Peterkingiron (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete he has not passed the notability requirements for football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 16:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - has not played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, failing WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails policies as mentioned in nomination. C 679 13:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.