Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Barron (actor) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Chuck Barron (actor)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, only scene awards at best. No independent reliable sourcing. The "Dave Awards" are not notable (the wikilink goes to a list) and were given by an individual non-notable magazine reviewer; as such they fail the PORNBIO award criterion in three ways, not being well-known, significant, nor industry awards. Prior (2010) AFD was inconclusive, found at Articles for deletion/Chuck Barron (pornographic actor), tied up in a broader and then-intractable dispute. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by admins since 2006. (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as not better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  19:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails PORNBIO and GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Source it or lose it. Spartaz Humbug! 06:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete fails the inclusion guidelines for pornographic actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with nominator's detailed analysis. Finnegas (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.