Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Finley (Burn Notice)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Sam Axe. Spartaz Humbug! 06:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Chuck Finley (Burn Notice)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a non-notable alias for a fictional character. Information is better suited at Sam Axe. Kevinbrogers (talk) 23:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

soft dynamite ]] (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge with Sam Axe. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge Stuartyeates (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sam Axe and Chuck Finley carry different contexts. These 2 are separate & distinct facets of the character. [[User:Softdynamite|


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Upmerge to Sam Axe. The fact is, both articles currently don't show why they should exist (WP:N, WP:NOT, WP:MOSFICT etc.), and both should be trimmed and merged to a character list until they satisfy the core criteria. But since only "Chuck Finley" is up for AfD and is a suptopic of "Sam Axe", it's better to clean up from the bottom before dealing with the top. – sgeureka t•c 08:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect with Sam Axe (no preference). szyslak  ( t ) 08:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to Sam Axe: The fictional character as an individual subject does not meet the general notability guideline and the article is mostly a plot-only description of a fictional work that does not provide reception or significance for the fictional character. Per sgeureka's argument and to generate consensus, a merge to Sam Axe is an acceptable outcome. Jfgslo (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect does not meet the WP:GNG because there are no third party sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.