Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Chuck Johnson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Chuck Johnson is simply not notable Jhay116 (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article links to his profile at IMDB, and there is only one entry, where he is listed as "Muscleman" --Kristjan Wager (talk) 09:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable no matter how I look at it. Article by a WP:SPA who only did this article and made edits to 2 articles to ensure Johnson got mentioned. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete INsufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Copyvio, also spam. Its basically an augmented version of the bio on his personal website (which oddly enough only lets you look at it long enough to notice its a copyvio before redirecting you to his Wikipedia article). - 2 ... says you, says me 20:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. Pure vanity page.Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs major sandblasting, but WP:GNG is met by in-depth coverage in Black ExPat Magazine, Metropolis, Japan Today (picked up by Virtyal Review).  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Two of those are the same reprinted press release intended to look like an "interview." - 2 ... says you, says me 14:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah. I was not aware that you were there. Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by that? - 2 ... says you, says me 03:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.