Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Matthei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Deleting as copyvio, there was not a final consensus on notability j⚛e deckertalk 01:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Chuck Matthei

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Long unreferenced and clearly a memorial, fails WP:GNG. – S. Rich (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * (Speedy) Delete: in my opinion he isn't notable, but the article as it stands is a substantial copyvio/close paraphrase of . BethNaught (talk) 14:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as copyvio, without prejudice against recreation. With the possible exception of the first paragraph, the article is a very slightly abridged copy of the obituary already referenced by User:BethNaught. Having said that, GBooks gives a lot of hits - many of these are either in passing or personal memoirs. But he obviously made such an impression on people that the chance that somewhere among them (or elsewhere) there are enough reliable sources to write a replacement article is quite high, PWilkinson (talk) 11:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.