Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Paugh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 02:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Chuck Paugh
I can find no G'hits for this fellow other than self-promotion articles (which includes this article). It is unreferenced, fails COI, notability and probably a few other things as well. Somebody has made some disparaging remarks at the bottom of the latest version of the article. A firm delete from me. --Richhoncho 11:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a heavily vandalised version of an article that has been around two years. That aside, there are no sources offered and the only ghits appear to be directory entries created by the subject. Nuttah68 13:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, article has not been sourced since it was created so I guess there will be none forthcoming Alf photoman 13:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per nom. - Cybergoth 18:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources so it is not WP:VSlideAndSlip 22:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete currently vandalized state aside, the article does not ASSERT notability per WP:BIO, and simple searching for criteria of notability by myself and the editors above has not come up with any. I say delete without predudice of recreation if/ when the contributor can satisfy WP:BIO and WP:COI, and produce a well-cited verifiable article written in a WP:NPOV.  Jerry lavoie 22:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.