Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuckie Fick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Chuckie Fick

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable minor league baseball player. Strikerforce (talk) 09:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. Spanneraol (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. Alex (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Since the creation of the article, my personal feelings towards notability have changed. So has consensus under WP:WPBB/N. —Brian Halvorsen (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable player per WP:WPBB/N. The text is prose synthesized from statistics sites, which is routine coverage, as opposed to being based on prevalence of articles from sources.  This may be acceptable for a major league player, but should not be for a minor leaguer. Bagumba (talk) 23:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BASIC, and WP:WPBB/N. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I would say merge to St. Louis Cardinals minor league players, like the others, but is it confirmed he's still in the Cardinals organization? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This seems to imply he is still with them. Spanneraol (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to St. Louis Cardinals minor league players at most. I understand the letter of WP:WPBB/N, but "unremarkable" is literally one injury away (particularly for pitchers). Moreover, "unremarkable" has a different context if they were not still active. Lastly, unreferencedBLP is erroneous when it clearly has 2 sources listed(baseball-ref, milb).Emjaymem (talk) 00:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.