Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chugging (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nom withdrawn. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Chugging
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reincarnation of previously deleted article, failed AfD as a non-notable neologism.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 13:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Good job to those who provided material support for this article. I rescind my nomination and recommend a speedy keep.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 03:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - (1) The article itself asserts that its subject is a neologism: "articles simply attempting to define a neologism are inappropriate" (WP:NEO) (2) There are many reliable sources that use the word "chugging", but "chugging" is not significantly the subject of the sources I have found.- Samuel  Tan  14:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - changed my stance in the light of the three sources provided below. Looks like the topic has been covered significantly in reliable sources (and so fulfills WP:N). - Samuel  Tan  15:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Would these sources be any good? ,, . RMHED (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. I've changed my stance. Are you the author? If you are, do remember to update the article with those sources. It will spare you the agony of yet another AFD.- Samuel  Tan  15:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Added refs and some more content. RMHED (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep A notable neologism, more than just a dicdef. RMHED (talk) 18:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - neologism in common use (at least in the UK); article is sourced and is more than a dicdef. JohnCD (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.