Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chun Ge (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I recognize the desire for one following two nominations within a year, but with barely any input after two relists, I don't see what is gained from a 3rd. Star  Mississippi  01:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Chun Ge
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I think this is a non-existent term and there are not many related reference materials in the article. Meets the criteria of Delete policy 6. Neologisms, it is recommended to delete. SU YIQI (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Popular culture, Internet,  and China.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Pinging Articles for deletion/Chun Ge participants:, , , and . Cunard (talk) 05:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I suggested this to be deleted a few months back, saying sourcing is poor and article is confusing. Folks said 'sources exist in Chinese', without citing any or improving the article. At best I think we should move it to a draftspace or userspace if someone wants to work on this; otherwise, deleting this is no big loss, given how poorly written this is - it can be recreated from scratch if someone cares, with proper sources (WP:TNT) later. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think anything has really changed since the last nomination. There's extensive sourcing at zh:春哥 which seems to be enough to meet GNG. As I said last time, the article could certainly use work, but it's an okay starting point and doesn't need TNT. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 23:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Keep This nickname that turned into an Internet meme or kuso meets Notability as demonstrated by the numerous sources at zh:春哥 such as 1, 2, 3, and 4. The article has room for improvement, but like Mx. Granger, I also think it is a good start and don't think TNT applies. The policies say that articles containing flaws should not be deleted if they can be improved. Deletion policy says, If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. Editing policy says, Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. Cunard (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.