Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Withdrawn by nominator) (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter123    (soliloquize)  @ 10:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Possible notability from being (a) formally established by Taiwan law, Relevant provisions from Wikisource (b) much quoted by news for economic predictions. See also zh:中華經濟研究院 for expansion.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 02:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Seems to be a notable research institution. --180.172.239.231 (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Philg88 ♦talk 06:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Government sponsored institute that seems well regarded in the field and potentially meets WP:ORG. Needs much better sourcing but that is for improvement through editing. The Whispering Wind (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn per all above, Boleyn (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.