Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung Chi-ming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fails to qualify for speedy delete A7 since being a Hong Kong broadcaster is credible and could be significant if there was significant coverage in independent reliable sources. However, such coverage does not exist to establish notability so delete per consensus. Philg88 ♦talk 05:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Chung Chi-ming

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was looking over this a couple weeks ago-he might be notable but I'm not sure-it might also be a inherited issue. Wgolf (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  00:25, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under A7 - The person in question has no notability outside of being someone's brother. Notability is not inherited. Aerospeed (Talk) 03:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * -yes I know that (unless if you are the related to the Queen of England :P lol), but it mentioned being a radio host-so I was unsure. Wgolf (talk) 03:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Note, when looking for sources, that there are a lot of people with the same name in Chinese script. Baidu Baike notes 3 in the mainland already. zhwp's 鍾志明 writes of a PRC People's Liberation Army general. There is also a Taiwanese university professor.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 05:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC) Also added Find Sources template
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Should have been speedy-deleted per A1. STSC (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe should have been speedy deleted. In any case delete due to WP:NOTINHERITED. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Bearian (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.