Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung Chien-peng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep — consensus that WP:AUTHOR is met, and nomination withdrawn. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Chung Chien-peng

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The page creator maintains that the subject satisfies WP:NAUTHOR, but I don't see it. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Withdrawn by the nominator - It looks like I misinterpted our requirements under WP:NAUTHOR. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article as nominated already includes multiple published in-depth reviews of multiple books by the subject. This is enough for WP:AUTHOR 4(c), and also enough for WP:GNG: we have multiple independent reliable in-depth secondary sources about the subject's contributions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with David Eppstein that the five reviews cited in the article are enough for a WP:NAUTHOR pass, and I think there's an argument to be made that his books and articles are cited frequently enough for a pass of WP:NPROF crit. 1, at least for a lower-citation field like international relations. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein. Mccapra (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:AUTHOR with existing citations. 47.46.83.102 (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.