Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung Yangmo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Chung Yangmo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks references, references has minor mentions. Ireneshih (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Either it "lacks references" or the references "ha[ve] minor mentions." Which one so I know the deletion rationale and can evaluate accordingly. Once of many AfDs you have done that I am scratching my head about. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - He is a leading historian of Korean Art and porcelain. His work is cited frequently but it's hard to find the information someone mention about himself. I've filled up short mention about his works. -- Chaseklee (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG in the normal way; he's been getting newspaper articles written about him for half a century. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep likely as this will particularly need familiar attention as it seems sources exist. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep At this point, the article has been improved to where it manifestly meets notability requirements, and I believe WP:SK would apply. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.