Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church (TV personality)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 23:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Church (TV personality)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Promotional and possible autobiographical article for a "personality" of questionable notability. Only sources referenced are either primary or user-submitted - no independent or verifiable third-party sources provided. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Who is Church? The article doesn't explain it well.  It is very spotty on information and just tells bits and pieces thus lacks the necessary information to assert notability.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - his promotional work for other bands is barely notable, but not for his own band. See also Articles for deletion/Hellflower. Bearian (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The only thing that would seem to go some way to establishing notability is the reality show that actually does seem to exist. However, the article is constantly edited by new editors and anonymous IPs that actually seem to be the same person and most likely are the subject himself. This/these editor(s) keep adding irrelevant info that is not or badly sourced. Given the only borderline notability, I think that at this point it is better to delete this article rather than keeping a bio that needs constant supervision by patient editors (my patience ran out a while ago)... --Crusio (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability - Article written like a promotional piece --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 03:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.