Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church Of Latter Days


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Church Of Latter Days

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think this religion meets notability guidelines such as WP:N. Google hits in general are mainly false positives for (Church of Latter Days Saints, Church of Latter Days Prophets), so I searched using "Church Of Latter Days" -"Church of Latter Days Saints" -"Church of Latter Days Prophets", which does bring up some Google Books hits, but all from before the supposed founding of this religion. The same query brings up 0 news hits. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 21:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This "Church" seems to be a website. Can't find anything else except a blog which may or may not be related.  Tigerboy1966  21:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This church, which was founded in August, 2011, has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  21:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per the reasons stated above. --  role player 01:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom DaveApter (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Cullen328; also WP:CRYSTAL and WP:MADEUP. No clear view that it's going anywhere, or that it will get into the news. Bearian (talk) 00:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the lack of general notability in the article and the fact that it seems to be WP:MADEUP. Nothing in the article is WP:VERIFIABLE. There isn't much discussion on this. Wer900  talkessay on the definition of consensus 22:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.