Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Reptar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, WP is not for things made up one day. Glass  Cobra  21:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Church of Reptar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Self-admitted AFD. Surely we should be able to speedy stuff like this? Sgroupace (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – I actually got a chuckle out of this one. Good luck to the founders.  Hopefully next time, they will spend their energy helping to improve articles rather than fabricating them. ShoesssS Talk 20:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as delightful hoax.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh no, not another one.: Delete this hoax per WP:SNOW. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 20:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, this made me laugh. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 20:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Reyk  YO!  20:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:BOLLOCKS. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If it's a 'self-admitted AFD' (I can't find the creator admitting that but I didn't look very hard) then it surely qualifies as CSD/G7. Olaf Davis | Talk 21:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.