Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Shaddapology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 20:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Church of Shaddapology
Not notable, probably vanity, Delete. See also Shaddapology abakharev 06:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. jnothman talk 06:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete probably a hoax (zero Google hits). - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 08:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above, there are problems with verifiability with zero Google hits. However, the person connected with Joe Dolce is notable according to WP:NMG having a number #1 hit with Shaddup You Face in Australia, the UK and elsewhere in 1980-81. I was proposing verifying it and adding it to his article which is in a disgraceful shape or writing an article about Shaddup You Face. Capitalistroadster 09:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 09:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --JJay 16:33, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as with related articles. --Roisterer 03:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and delete related vanity pages as well, as per comments at Shaddapology. Or just maybe merge -> User:DolceJ.  Regards, Ben Aveling 07:32, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think Joe Dolce owes us all a Shaddapology for posting this rubbish. Snottygobble | Talk 06:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think Joe Dolce owes us all a Shaddapology for posting this rubbish. Snottygobble | Talk 06:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I think we have consensus. Someone care to do the honors? Ben Aveling 07:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.