Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill College Junior Common Room


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Churchill College Junior Common Room

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Organization does not seem to meet requirements set out in the notability guidelines, or the organization-specific guideline. There is a single outside reference for this article, which itself does not actually mention this organization at all, but is an obituary for a professor at the school. I don't see any evidence that this is a particulatly notable student group, and it seems that unless some independent references materialize, this group is not notable enoigh for an article. Jayron32. talk . contribs 16:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have removed two of the references from the article. The first one was a broken link and the second does not discuss the subject at all. Salih  ( talk ) 16:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —TerriersFan (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete – nothing out there to establish notability of the room specifically. I honestly don't think a redirect would make sense here as I cannot see why this would be plausible of a search term. MuZemike 01:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I see nothing to satisfy WP:N or WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its claim to fame is covered in Representation of the People Act 1969; other than that it isn't notable. Rd232 talk 22:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.