Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill Knight & Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Churchill Knight & Associates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The latest bit of paid promotion for the non notable business. Business lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None of the so called awards are major. Current sourcing is a mix of PR, primary and a minor mentions. A search found nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG no evidence of notability at all. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 13:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unable to find evidence that this company meets WP:CORP.  Analysis by the nom appears to be spot on - the refs in the article are minor, routine or PR.-- Mojo Hand (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.