Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chutia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 14:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Chutia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I proposed the article for deletion, but there was an objection, thus I have nominated it here. The article is a slang term and violates WP:NOTDICDEF. Bladeofgrass (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

The reason for not deleting this, is the same which all the ‘right to information activists’ cite for not banning sites as these(wiki.s) in most of the communist and the Arab world. Let’s all be free and informed. Knowledge is precious, whatever be its form and considering that obscenities are the first words that anyone learns in new language, having an inaccurate idea of their meaning can prove fatal.Free.obama (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't want this article to be deleted because I am against the freedom of information, but rather that Wikipedia is not meant to be a dictionary (WP:DIC). Perhaps this belongs in the Hindi Wikitionary? Bladeofgrass (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Please soapbox somewhere else. Thank you, MuZemike 19:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or move. At least as far as the EN goes, this article clearly fails WP:NOT Mrathel (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a dictionary entry, albeit a very long and completely unreferenced one. Drmies (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there a possibility of a transwiki to a Wikipedia or Wiktionary of another language? MuZemike 19:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Based on the note near the end I suspect it's a clear case of WP:NFT, so unless evidence turns up I recommend against transwikification. - Mgm|(talk) 22:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It's already at the English wiktionary.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete WP:NFT does not apply here, as a gsearch comes up with many ghits for this term with this usage. The problem is one of reliable sources. Most of the ghits are blogs, forum posts, urban dictionary and the like. If someone can come up with reliable sources that show the notability of this term, I'll gladly take another look, but right now all we seem to have is a dictionary definition.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone except for the "INFORMATION IS FREE" nonsense. JuJube (talk) 23:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing wrong in principle with having encyclopedia articles on slang words, and nothing in WP:WINAD prohibits it. I can easily imagine that a worthy encyclopedia article could be written about this word. But the existing article isn't it. It's a mess of poorly written original research and speculation, and doesn't even provide any sources that people could start working from to write a good article. —Angr 14:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Violates WP:NAD. It's allready on wiktionary, the article itself is completley unreferenced. --DFS454 (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NAD, WP:OR, WP:N. I'm  Jack (Lumber) and I approve this message. 02:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

If the Arse hole can stay then so can the Chutia. All objections here are as well correct for the arse hole but it stays, for as they say, ' no one has the right to censor what we ought to know and what not to.'Free.obama (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * KEEP.
 * Arse at least is coherent – and English. —Tamfang (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.