Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuut-Riit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete JERRY talk contribs 23:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Chuut-Riit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no assertion of notability through reliable sources, and as such its just an in-universe plot repetition of various plot points from the source article. Therefore, it should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, Ah yes, the careful Kzinti Admiral. AnteaterZot (talk) 03:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fictional character with no notability in the wider world. Fails WP:FICTION.  Lankiveil (talk) 04:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Unless notability can be proven by sources, per the guidelines of WP:FICT this should be merged into Man-Kzin Wars —Quasirandom (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * merge. Blueanode (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Give an article a chance. Happy New Year!  Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 18:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin. The page that Le Grand mentions is just an essay and isn't a requirement to follow when editing. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge, I checked, there are no online sources that could be used to save this article. In light of the fact that there is a place to merge, it should be merged there. AnteaterZot (talk) 02:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Gavin Collins (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails WP:V and WP:NOT. There are no reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of this stock character outside of the Man-Kzin Wars franchise. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment On what basis do you claim this is a stock character? Edward321 (talk) 03:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No real world significance is established or even suggested for this character, & it therefore fails our notability requirements for fictional topics. Eusebeus (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.