Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chwele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (nominator !voted keep) &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Chwele

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article does not seem to meet any notability guidelines. Additionally, it has no sources and I feel it relies on personal views. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks like a town to me.  A quick g-book search brings up reference to the area as an agriculture center, as the text of the article indicates.  Nominating an article that's not patent nonsense or the like within 4 hours of its creation  is not helpful to this project and only serves to discourage new editors. --Oakshade (talk) 01:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Quite some issues with the article (tone, references...), but notability is not one of them. It's a small place, from what I found on some searches, but some sort of a regional centre. noisy   jinx  huh? 02:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The town, though small, is the home of Kenya's second largest open air market. Notability is straightforward.  You can complain about the article being poorly sourced, but that's an argument for WP:BETTER, not deleting the thing.   Edward Vielmetti (talk) 02:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep correct me if I'm wrong, I've been away from AFD a while, but I thought that human settlements and geographical areas were inherently notable. Certainly this town is, as indicated above. The article is vastly improved over its condition when nommed. (Eventually I'll be able to look up the inherent notability.)  Dloh  cierekim  05:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Could not find anything accept per outcomes, articles like this have generally been kept, particularly in its present state.  Dloh  cierekim  05:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Dloh, this article has gotten much better since I had nommed it. I also agree it should be kept. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.