Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chx wager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  03:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Chx wager


Vanity project, with no use other than to redirect people here during online "debates" in an effort to win. There aren't even any other pages that link to it within Wikipedia, nobody conisders this article of any use other than those who created it Stenun 03:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The use of the word "vanity" as a reason for deletion is now strongly discouraged per WP:COI. Please instead use "Conflict of interest". Jpe|ob 00:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * delete per nom Devotchka 03:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dar-Ap e  03:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kavadi carrier 04:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Robovski 04:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom User:Chris_Sheehan 09:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC) - Infantile, illogical argument based on a series of assumptions and of parochial interest. Known only as an inside joke to the creator's circle of friends and best kept that way.  Unworthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.
 * Delete per nom. FembotControls 04:56 9 November 2006 (UTC) CHX wager is a waste of space on here. It sullies wikipedia's reputation and has no merit or value. It's a preposterous article with no basis in truth and is only here to serve as an ego boost to its creator. It should be deleted immediately. -- — Fembotcontrols (talk • contribs)  has made few or no other edits outside this topic. user's second edit. Kavadi carrier 17:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as per nomination. Possibly candidate for speedy? Xdenizen 21:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 22:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school on a messageboard one day. -- Xtifr tälk 00:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nomination. Ariah 18:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.