Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciantar-Paleologo

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. dbenbenn | talk 22:18, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ciantar-Paleologo
More gratuitous genealogy. Also 'used from such and such site with permission' doesn't necessarily conform to the WP license. Radiant! 12:52, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, genealogy, possible copyvio, reads as if there's an underlying political agenda. Wyss 17:09, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Question: Are they related to the Palaeologus dynasty which has its own article? User:Dimadick
 * There appears to be a relation, even if they are separated by five centuries. The Palaeologus are from the Byzantine Empire, and the Ciantar seem to have been given the title after the fall thereof. Possible merge. Radiant! 11:46, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Brookie 18:44, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - "used with permission" in this case means the guy who runs that site uploaded these articles himself. You might want to talk to User:Tancarville - there are tons of Maltese nobility articles. Adam Bishop 22:53, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - David Gerard 23:00, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 04:15, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.