Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciaphas Cain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ciaphas Cain

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

original research and plot summary that fails to establish WP:GNG through citations to significant coverage by multiple third-party reliable sources. --EEMIV (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Warhammer. Operating (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Imperial Guard (Warhammer 40,000)'s section on characters, with notes on character's role within the setting. Peptuck (talk) 02:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.  -- --  pb30 < talk > 01:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Main character in a series of novels--has anyone checked for reviews of them? Presumably he's given significant mention. Although I do not know the literature for this subject,, I know when there's no assertion that a search has even been attempted. DGG (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- a Google search for "Ciaphas Cain" doesn't yield any reliable secondary sources. All the sources given in the article are primary. The aricle is riddled with original research. Reyk  YO!  01:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep You might not have noticed, but there are entire books on the article's subject. 88.64.187.89 (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.