Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciarán Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Black Kite under criteria G3; "pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes". (non-admin closure). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Ciarán Jones

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I was torn with tagging this as an attack page for speedy deletion. None of the references seem to support the content properly and it is full of negative comments that are offensive and unreferenced. It's well crafted to hide the fact that it is an attack page unless it is read carefully. I think it is better deleted than "cleaned up" leaving this kind of stuff in the history:


 * "Ciarán Jones had no children yet, but would love a little asian kid he can kick in the face."
 * "In 2012, it was discovered that Ciarán has an accurate net worth of approximately $10000 trillion."
 * "Ciarán fell out with Drake due to his arrogance and lack of understand of the music world. Drake confronted Ciarán, but Eminem broke them up, Drake told Eminem he would have to choose who he would work with, Ciarán or Drake. Eminem chose Ciarán and since then they haven't looked back. Drake is an unknown artist now and probably working on trying to get his fame back."
 * "Ciarán stated that, contrary to rumors, Eminem and Ciarán were together again and would soon be getting married." QU TalkQu 21:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as hoax. Essentially a copy of Royce da 5'9" with names and details changed. Take a look t the intros to both articles :). FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 21:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, good spot. I should have noticed all the references were about Royce da 5'9" when I read them (I did notice it but it didn't twig). Thanks QU TalkQu 21:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under criteria G3: "pure vandalism...blatant and obvious misinformation". Tagged as such, can't have rubbish like this hanging around. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.