Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cibecue Creek, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Cibecue Creek, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another exercise in bad map-reading, this is (or was) a picnic area; at least, that's what '60s-'70s topo maps say. But it sits on Cibecue Creek, and someone conflated the two and created this nonexistent "populated place" in GNIS. I couldn't tell whether there is anything there any more, but in any case a picnic area is not notable, even if it were named. Mangoe (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The picnic area may (but only may) merit reference on an article on a larger place but does not need a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note This title should probably be a page about the creek, which certainly satisfies WP:GNG, and also act as a kindof dab page for Cibecue, Arizona, the Battle of Cibecue Creek, and Western Apache people. At the moment if you type "Cibecue Creek" into our search box you only get this page and the battle.Pontificalibus 08:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article stub is written. Fails SNG and GNG. No prejudice against Pontificalibus suggestion of a new article about the creek which would pass WP:GEOLAND Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. . Lightburst (talk) 04:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and Rewrite as Cibecue Creek (the actual creek) per Pontificalibus. GNIS cites "Arizona Outdoor Recreation Coordinating Commission. Recreational Site Inventory" which almost certainly refers to the picnic area, however the creek itself seems notable enough for an article. –dlthewave ☎ 20:00, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not a notable place. A Cibecue Creek article can be written since waterways are often notable. Wm335td (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and/or rewrite Listed here as a locale, not a populated place. Seems like the creek has a better chance at meeting notability standards. Glendoremus (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KartikeyaS  (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.